Case Study: Professional Infringement Search Report by Patenti

Disclaimer: The patent number and product referenced are used solely for educational purposes to illustrate an infringement report as a legal case study. They do not imply any ongoing litigation or suggest actual infringement. This content is intended for learning only.

For any queries, please feel free to contact us.

Introduction

This case study investigates the potential infringement of US Patent Application US20210281357A1, titled “Bandwidth Puncture and Response Rules”, by the TP-Link EAP660 HD AX3600 WiFi 6 Access Point.

The patent, assigned to Apple Inc., introduces mechanisms for transmitting Extremely High Throughput (EHT) PPDUs across non-contiguous sub-bands while omitting specific “punctured” sub-bands to optimize spectral efficiency and minimize interference. The TP-Link EAP660 HD, with its advanced Wi-Fi 6 features and dual-band high-capacity transmission, serves as a suitable candidate for comparative technical analysis. This study aims to evaluate functional and semantic overlaps, examine MAC-level architecture alignment, and assess the need for deeper chip-level or firmware-based investigation to determine the likelihood of infringement.

Use of Patenti’s Proprietary AI Engine

This report was generated using Patenti’s proprietary AI engine, which leverages large-scale patent embeddings, NLP-based similarity scoring, and domain-specific semantic interpretation to match product documentation with claim language at scale. The engine applies multi-layered natural language reasoning to flag potential overlaps, compute functional and textual relevance scores, and provide AI explainability for each mapping decision. This enables faster and more precise infringement assessment compared to traditional manual review.

Key Features

TP-Link EAP660 HD Key Features:

Ultra-Fast Wi-Fi 6 Speeds: Up to 1148 Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band and 2402 Mbps on the 5 GHz band, totaling 3550 Mbps.
High-Density Connectivity: Capacity increased by fourfold, supporting more simultaneous device connections.
Omada SDN Integration: Zero-Touch Provisioning, centralized cloud management, intelligent monitoring, and seamless roaming.
Centralized Management: Cloud-based access via the Omada app simplifies management.
High-Speed Ethernet Port: Equipped with a 2.5 Gbps Ethernet port.
Seamless Roaming: Maintains stable video streams and voice calls across locations.
Power over Ethernet (PoE+): Simplifies deployment and installation with support for IEEE 802.3at.
Secure Guest Network: Offers multiple authentication methods and robust wireless security.

Summary of US20210281357A1:

Title: Bandwidth Puncture and Response Rules
Applicant: Apple Inc.
Publication Date: September 9, 2021
Application Number: 17/194,782
Priority Date: March 9, 2020
CPC Classification: H04L 1/0013, H04L 5/0055, H04W 84/12
Core Invention: The patent discloses a system and method for efficiently transmitting data using an Extremely High Throughput (EHT) Physical Layer Convergence Protocol Data Unit (PPDU) over multiple non-contiguous frequency sub-bands while intentionally excluding ("puncturing") certain sub-bands. These punctured sub-bands may be avoided due to interference, regulatory constraints, or co-existence with legacy devices.

Key Features:

EHT PPDUs are transmitted across non-contiguous sub-bands separated by punctured bands.
Block acknowledgments (BA) received from the recipient device exclude the punctured sub-band.
Bitmaps are used to indicate the presence and structure of punctured sub-bands, and can be exchanged via MAC headers or multi-station acknowledgment frames.
The punctured sub-band is at least 20 MHz wide and differs from the primary sub-band.
Supports dynamic configuration and feedback mechanisms between access points and clients, including real-time bitmap requests/responses to indicate puncture locations.

Problem Solved: This patent addresses the challenges posed by channel interference, congestion, and legacy device compatibility in Wi-Fi networks. It improves spectral efficiency by allowing dynamic exclusion of problematic frequency segments without compromising throughput.

Applicable Standards:

Designed with future Wi-Fi standards like IEEE 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7) in mind, which support punctured transmission and multi-user access (OFDMA, MU-MIMO).

Relevance: Devices implementing advanced MAC-layer logic for frequency shaping, bandwidth management, or sub-band signaling may potentially align with this patent, especially those enabling dynamic, non-contiguous spectrum utilization.

Reference Links

Product Breakdown

The product analyzed is the TP-Link EAP660 HD AX3600 WiFi 6 Wireless Dual Band Multi-Gigabit Ceiling Mount Access Point, which includes features such as:

Simultaneous dual-band operations at 2.4 GHz (1148 Mbps) and 5 GHz (2402 Mbps).
Omada SDN integration (Cloud Management, Zero-Touch Provisioning).
High-density device connectivity.
Advanced security features and Power over Ethernet (PoE+).
Ethernet throughput via a 2.5 Gbps Ethernet port
.

Technical Evaluation and Patent Claims Mapping

The patent US20210281357A1 describes a bandwidth puncture method within an EHT PPDU (Extremely High Throughput Physical Layer Convergence Protocol Data Unit), where transmissions utilize multiple non-contiguous sub-bands separated by punctured sub-bands to improve spectrum efficiency.

Integration Synergy

The EAP660’s Omada Cloud SDN management can potentially leverage EHT features described in the patent for efficient bandwidth management, thus enhancing integration synergy.

Evaluation of Explicit Patent Claim Elements

Claim No.	Patent Claim Element	Product Feature	Semantic Match Score	AI Explainability
1	EHT PPDU transmission in multiple non-contiguous sub-bands separated by punctured sub-bands	Wi-Fi 6 simultaneous dual-band feature	75%	Moderate semantic correlation due to dual-band operation
2	Block acknowledgment excluding punctured sub-band	Advanced QoS features implicitly	62%	Moderate inference from QoS and network management
3	Punctured sub-band at least 20 MHz different from primary sub-band	Not explicitly documented	45%	Low correlation; feature not explicitly described

Functional Match Vs Textual Similarity

Functionality	Functional Match	Textual Similarity
Dual-band operation management	Moderate	High
Advanced wireless throughput	High	Moderate
Acknowledgment mechanisms	Moderate	Low

Litigation History

No known litigations or legal disputes were identified on either the patent or the TP-Link product as of this analysis.

Formatted Infringement Claim Chart

Claim No.	Claim Feature	TP-Link EAP660 Support	Evidence/Observation	AI Explainability
1	EHT PPDU in non-contiguous bands	Partial implicit support	Dual-band operation	Moderate correlation inferred from dual-band capability
2	Puncture Sub-band >20MHz	No explicit support	Product documentation does not detail this feature	Low correlation; feature absent from documentation
3	Block acknowledgment mechanisms	Partial implicit support	QoS and network management capabilities	Moderate correlation inferred from QoS descriptions

AI Explainability Assessment

AI semantic analysis identified moderate correlation (75% maximum semantic match score) between patent claims and the product, indicating possible indirect implementation of patent methodologies, though explicit evidence is insufficient.

Chip-Level Teardown or Firmware Layer Analysis

1. Chip-Level Teardown Analysis for EAP620 HD

We will identify the chipset used in the TP-Link EAP620 HD to examine if it implements MAC-level logic consistent with US20210281357A1.

Target: Confirm if it uses:

Qualcomm IPQ6010 or similar (common in TP-Link Wi-Fi 6 APs)
Mediatek / Broadcom variants

2. Comparative Claim Mapping Across Wi-Fi 6 Devices

Here is the comparison grid between the US20210281357A1 patent and these Wi-Fi 6 devices:

Device	Manufacturer	Target Chipset	Included in Analysis?
EAP620 HD	TP-Link	TBD	✅
Catalyst 9130AX	Cisco	Qualcomm	✅
DAP-X2850	D-Link	Qualcomm IPQ8072A	✅
Aruba 550	HPE Aruba	Broadcom	✅

We can assess:

MAC-level behavior (claim-specific)
RU allocation strategy
Channel reassignment logic
PHY header behavior (for NAV, MCS, etc.)

Based on reference(links below) information, the TP-Link EAP620 HD Access Point is designed for high-density environments, supporting over 1,000 concurrent clients. This capability is likely due to its hardware configuration, which includes two ESMT M15T4G16256A DDR3 memory chips, as observed in internal comparisons with models like the EAP610 https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/forum/topic/535928

https://www.reddit.com/r/TPLink_Omada/comments/pw9u37/what_are_the_differences_between_the_eap620_hd/

While some TP-Link access points utilize Qualcomm chipsets, such as the IPQ6010, this cannot be confirmed for the EAP620 HD without direct evidence.

Recommendations:

Direct Inquiry: Contact TP-Link support or consult official product documentation for precise chipset information.
Physical Inspection: If feasible, a teardown of the device could reveal the chipset model.
FCC Filings: Reviewing the device's FCC filings may provide insights into its internal components.

Identifying the chipset is crucial for assessing potential overlaps with US20210281357A1, as the implementation of MAC scheduling methods may vary between different chipsets.

Conclusion & Recommendation

Based on the available documentation, semantic matching, and functional analysis, the TP-Link EAP660 HD AX3600 does not explicitly implement the bandwidth puncture mechanisms or block acknowledgment logic as claimed in US20210281357A1. While the device supports Wi-Fi 6 (IEEE 802.11ax) features such as dual-band concurrent transmission and high-density performance, there is no clear indication of:

Transmission over non-contiguous sub-bands with intentional puncturing,
Omission of specific sub-bands during acknowledgment (block ACK) exchanges,
Use of bitmaps to dynamically signal or manage punctured sub-band locations.

The semantic similarity scores (max 75%) suggest moderate overlap in concepts such as throughput optimization and band-aware signaling. However, these alignments appear to stem from general Wi-Fi 6 enhancements rather than unique implementations protected under the patent.

This report was generated using Patenti’s proprietary AI engine, which uses patent embeddings and domain-specific NLP to match product documentation with claim language. By applying multi-layered semantic reasoning, the system flags potential overlaps, scores relevance, and delivers AI explainability—enabling faster, more accurate infringement assessments than manual methods.

Recommendations

No immediate legal action is advised based solely on current product literature and user-facing documentation.
Proceed with chip-level teardown or firmware-layer inspection if proprietary features or closed-source firmware indicates deeper alignment with MAC-level puncturing logic.
Engage TP-Link for disclosure or confirm chipset vendor (e.g., Qualcomm, MediaTek) to assess whether base firmware includes EHT-specific logic extensions relevant to Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), which may raise future IP risk.
Monitor product updates or new firmware releases for any transition toward punctured transmission strategies, especially if TP-Link integrates support for IEEE 802.11be.
Maintain a defensive IP posture by indexing patents covering Wi-Fi 6E and 7 features to preemptively identify overlapping implementations in next-gen TP-Link Omada products.